@Article{LuLiMorDutBat:2014:RoTeIm,
author = "Lu, D. and Li, G. and Moran, E. and Dutra, Luciano Vieira and
Batistella, M.",
affiliation = "Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Carbon Cycling in Forest
Ecosystems and Carbon Sequestration, School of Environmental \&
Resource Sciences, Zhejiang A\&F UniversityHangzhou, Zhejiang
Province, China; Center for Global Change and Earth Observations,
Michigan State UniversityEast Lansing, MI, United States and
Center for Global Change and Earth Observations, Michigan State
UniversityEast Lansing, MI, United States and Center for Global
Change and Earth Observations, Michigan State UniversityEast
Lansing, MI, United States and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and Embrapa Satellite MonitoringCampinas, SP,
Brazil",
title = "The roles of textural images in improving land-cover
classification in the Brazilian Amazon",
journal = "International Journal of Remote Sensing",
year = "2014",
volume = "35",
number = "24",
pages = "8188--8207",
keywords = "Maximum likelihood, Pixels, Satellites, Synthetic aperture radar,
Textures, Advanced land observing satellites, Classification
accuracy, Correlation coefficient, Grey-level co-occurrence
matrixes, Land-cover classification, Landsat Thematic Mapper,
Maximum likelihood classifiers, Phased array type l-band synthetic
aperture radars, Image texture.",
abstract = "Texture has long been recognized as valuable in improving
land-cover classification, but how data from different sensors
with varying spatial resolutions affect the selection of textural
images is poorly understood. This research examines textural
images from the Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM), ALOS (Advanced Land
Observing Satellite) PALSAR (Phased Array type L-band Synthetic
Aperture Radar), the SPOT (Satellite Pour l'Observation de la
Terre) high-resolution geometric (HRG) instrument, and the
QuickBird satellite, which have pixel sizes of 30, 12.5, 10/5, and
0.6 m, respectively, for land-cover classification in the
Brazilian Amazon. GLCM (grey-level co-occurrence matrix)-based
texture measures with various sizes of moving windows are used to
extract textural images from the aforementioned sensor data. An
index based on standard deviations and correlation coefficients is
used to identify the best texture combination following
separability analysis of land-cover types based on training sample
plots. A maximum likelihood classifier is used to conduct the
land-cover classification, and the results are evaluated using
field survey data. This research shows the importance of textural
images in improving land-cover classification, and the importance
becomes more significant as the pixel size improved. It is also
shown that texture is especially important in the case of the ALOS
PALSAR and QuickBird data. Overall, textural images have less
capability in distinguishing land-cover types than spectral
signatures, especially for Landsat TM imagery, but incorporation
of textures into radiometric data is valuable for improving
land-cover classification. The classification accuracy can be
improved by 5.2-13.4% as the pixel size changes from 30 to
0.6 m.",
doi = "10.1080/01431161.2014.980920",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2014.980920",
issn = "0143-1161",
label = "scopus 2015-01 LuLiMorDutBat:2014:RoTeIm",
language = "en",
urlaccessdate = "28 abr. 2024"
}